Wont be able to preform at the Grammys

🤖 AI Summary

No AI summary has been generated for this thread yet.
First of all, Howard rules and so do boobs!! And i don't see what the hell is the big deal. Accidently or not, it's over, it was just a slit freakin' second.
 
bigrthnEver said:
I wish U2 performed. Now that's a performance worth watching. Any of you remember their performance recently, I can't remember if it was last years Supa Bowl. But they kicked major ass and began their performance with the song "Where the streets have no name". I think it was the Super Bowl b/c I remember two banners representing the images of the twin towers and the names of everyone perished on that day scrolled down the banners.....

that was unforgettable!
Click to expand...


That was Superbowl 37! 🙂 I cried the whole time they were singin! 🙁


It was a nice tribute to those that were lost on 9/11!
 
I think that it is a good thing if they are banned. They did it as a publicity stunt to promote Janets new CD in March and if they are on the Grammys after that little "malfunction" people will watch in record numbers. To me, it was her boob, big deal, but you do have to remember, this isnt MTV, it is prime time TV and people of all walks of life all over the world watch the SuperBowl, they have a right to decide if they want to see something like this...before it is forced on them.
If an ordinary person pulled a stunt like that...they would be penalized, why shouldnt they?
 
This is real stupid. To spend our tax money on a investigation like this. FCC seems to have limitless money for a full blow investigation. They should put some of this money in investigating things like who leaked out about that female CIA agent or investigate where the puck up was with the weapons of mass destruction where are they if there was any. We investigate the stupid stuff and forget the shit that really matters.



tank
 
ChuckD said:
Oh please.....with all the crap that Madonna has pulled over the years, does anyone really think that this will have a negative affect on Janet's or Justin's career?

As for them being banned from the grammys, whateva...

Just makes me think of all the drug usesers and alcholics, rapists, and wife beaters who have perfomed on the grammy stage, and there were no problems.
Click to expand...

you know what I'm saying? all the negativity is what makes money in thier pockets. Janet will still make money. Justin will make money. Did anyone catch Janets show when it was on HBO? Hot HOt HOt! You know I'm gonna go flash my tit too!! lmaoooo!
 
I saw that show, come on lets go show ur boobs so we can make money also. LOL. But it is the morality and stupidness, people don't think and it is true, they will make money. Like tank said money is going to be spent on something that was just plain stupid and the things or investigations that really need don't get it . This gets me pissed. :angered
 
I would not care anyway. Who watches the Grammys anyway?

Personally, they need to perform there so people won't fall asleep watching that junk. :typing
 
the grammys are a drag, they do need janet and justin up in there
to spice things up!
i thought what janet did at the half time show
was HOT!!! she has my support, now more than ever.
if they do get banned from the grammys then i hope other
artist who are set to be there wont perform....
M
 
BBOY3000 said:
the grammys are a drag, they do need janet and justin up in there
to spice things up!
i thought what janet did at the half time show
was HOT!!! she has my support, now more than ever.
if they do get banned from the grammys then i hope other
artist who are set to be there wont perform....
M
Click to expand...
I agree 100 %


tank
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top