budman
New member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2001
- Messages
- 205
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I know that there is a thread reg the downfall of micmac and Cutting, but how many peeps here think that cutting productions sounded more solid as oppose to micmac where I notice back in my early days of dj had a lot treble, or highs, whatever they are called, and cutting sounded much raw, stronger, (hopefully I am making sense) more deep, bassier....
I used to make a lot of tapes, and whenever I would take a micmac record I would have to do a lot of adjustments on my eq, if not the tapes would come out w/ alot treble, so I started buying metal tapes, to reduce the treble, and cutting was differednt I did not have that problem, it wasnt until later on that Micmac improved its sound quality,,,,,but on another note, whenever OS would produce Soave, his songs did not sound w/ all that treble, does it depend on the producer and what they use to produce...I hope I made sense, but does anyone here know what I am talking about...LOL>>
I used to make a lot of tapes, and whenever I would take a micmac record I would have to do a lot of adjustments on my eq, if not the tapes would come out w/ alot treble, so I started buying metal tapes, to reduce the treble, and cutting was differednt I did not have that problem, it wasnt until later on that Micmac improved its sound quality,,,,,but on another note, whenever OS would produce Soave, his songs did not sound w/ all that treble, does it depend on the producer and what they use to produce...I hope I made sense, but does anyone here know what I am talking about...LOL>>