hey
well over the past couple of days many opinions have been surfacing about sept 11 and wut we do now. one thing that kinda bothered me was the rebuilding topic...
at first i was for it yeah bigger better show them that. but now i dont agree, many victims have never been recovered so basically thats their grave, that site is a cemetary...like we would never even dream of putting a land mark building on an exsiting cemetary now...so y would we do it at the wtc site...the lease holder was saying that part of the leasing contract states that by law he has to rebuild, hey i think an excpetion should be made in this case. i heard a lot of the victims families saying that the wtc site is their loved ones grave, i think a park type thing would be appropriate but hey thats just my opinion...
well over the past couple of days many opinions have been surfacing about sept 11 and wut we do now. one thing that kinda bothered me was the rebuilding topic...
at first i was for it yeah bigger better show them that. but now i dont agree, many victims have never been recovered so basically thats their grave, that site is a cemetary...like we would never even dream of putting a land mark building on an exsiting cemetary now...so y would we do it at the wtc site...the lease holder was saying that part of the leasing contract states that by law he has to rebuild, hey i think an excpetion should be made in this case. i heard a lot of the victims families saying that the wtc site is their loved ones grave, i think a park type thing would be appropriate but hey thats just my opinion...