Much2Fresh
New member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2001
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
After reading these forums as a bystandard, I could no longer keep quiet and had to finally register to post on this forum. TKA's abandonement of freestyle has left me quite confused about the genre of music in and of itself. I have some important questions and it seems as if Tybless or TKA themselves may be the only ones who can answer them.
1. Is freestyle music really "Latin Hip-Hop". If it is, that paints an image of freestyle being "street" and very focused on rugged breakbeats. Why did the "inventors" of Latin Hip Hop choose not to further develop it in this manner?
2. Why does TKA not want to see something that they helped create succeed. As an entrepenuer, if you invent something, and that something becomes a laughing stock, human instinct would force you to go out and do whatever you can to save it.
3. A long time ago, Tybless pointed out that a big reason why freestyle was not as successful as hip hop was that no matter how many records an artist sold, his realness would still be tested, and he'd be checked by the streets. I 100% agree with that. So why would TKA ("Inventors of Latin Hip Hop/ Kings of Freestyle") come out after so many years with an album anything less than 100% hardcore breakbeat freestyle? After all, you know how the pop boy band stuff gets no respect on the streets.
4. Why would TKA first deny "ever being freestyle", then say that anything in the last 8 years was a "cheap imitation", and finally say that freestyle is singing anything over popular music. If that's the definition, then the backstreet boys, jennifer lopez, and britney spears are all freestyle. Right? But we all know that's not true.
I'm just real confused by the actions of a group that used to be my favorite. Maybe a reply could clear up all the confusion.
1. Is freestyle music really "Latin Hip-Hop". If it is, that paints an image of freestyle being "street" and very focused on rugged breakbeats. Why did the "inventors" of Latin Hip Hop choose not to further develop it in this manner?
2. Why does TKA not want to see something that they helped create succeed. As an entrepenuer, if you invent something, and that something becomes a laughing stock, human instinct would force you to go out and do whatever you can to save it.
3. A long time ago, Tybless pointed out that a big reason why freestyle was not as successful as hip hop was that no matter how many records an artist sold, his realness would still be tested, and he'd be checked by the streets. I 100% agree with that. So why would TKA ("Inventors of Latin Hip Hop/ Kings of Freestyle") come out after so many years with an album anything less than 100% hardcore breakbeat freestyle? After all, you know how the pop boy band stuff gets no respect on the streets.
4. Why would TKA first deny "ever being freestyle", then say that anything in the last 8 years was a "cheap imitation", and finally say that freestyle is singing anything over popular music. If that's the definition, then the backstreet boys, jennifer lopez, and britney spears are all freestyle. Right? But we all know that's not true.
I'm just real confused by the actions of a group that used to be my favorite. Maybe a reply could clear up all the confusion.